TLA Goes Underground - Are Paid Links Evil?
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed.
I received an email from Text Link Ads a couple days ago telling me that I had to update my affiliate links to their new ones. Fair enough, but then I noticed that the new ones were being run through the “tinyurl.com” service.
Here’s my new beautiful affiliate link: http://tinyurl.com/2twhrb
Very weird, I thought….why would they completely give away their brand and have their entire system rely on a third party website (that’s a major business dependency and a huge risk point).
Then the answer became obvious…Text Link Ads is going underground in response to Matt Cutts and Google’s basically declaring war against paid links. Here’s more background than you’re ever going to read:
- SES Paid Link Presentation
- SEOmoz | The Paid Links Debate Rages On - SES San Jose 2007
- Are Paid Links Evil: SES, San Jose 2007 » Unofficial SEO Blog
- Bruceclay.com - Are Paid Links Evil?
At first I was ready to wave an angry flag about how Google was abusing their power and spreading fear and paranoia in an effort to make webmasters “be good” so their job as a search engine would be easier.
Then I read this excellent post from John Andrews called Understanding the Google and I actually began to see things a little bit differently.
Matt Cutts communicated very clearly that Google wants to see more of the kind of content that drives adoption of the web. Google is a carrot and stick company, as we all know too well. The stick goes to paid links. The carrot goes to good content. For those who weren’t there, I’ll recap.
The session was about purchased back links, and why Google says they are bad. One of the complaining panelists asked why Google values links earned by a funny video but devalues links that are bought. Specifically, if a real estate guy posts a funny video on the politics of the search marketing industry, and earns a collection of backlinks, why do those back links count when they are off-topic and have nothing to do with real estate? That was a good question. And there was a good answer. Matt answered that the funny video was creative, was unique, and added something to the web, but the paid links did not. Did you hear that?
Google is talking. Are you listening?
I think that when you live in a dictatorial society, and that’s what life as a webmaster these days certainly is…with Google being the dictator, it is easy to assume the dictator is evil and has only his best interest in mind. After all that’s how we would all behave if we had almost absolute power
but what if the dictator really is wise and benevolent…what then?
Just something to think about, I really liked John’s refreshing take on the story and I find that I enjoy believing in the goodness of playing in alignment with the dictator as opposed to fearing where the next shoe will drop.
- Jon Symons
PS. Want a blog SEO tip? …notice how John’s individual post pages do not have sidebars or even menus or categories. Each post has a link to the next and previous, a link to the home page, and his “about page” and a link to the feed at the bottom of the page. That’s it. From what I’m learning at Theme Zoom this is the correct why to setup a page for maximum SEO benefit. I’ve been craving to “go lean” with my theme and I think I’ll borrow a few ideas from John’s site.


Also try out Kontera ContentLink™ they use the content of you website and add links to other websites using main keywords from your content.
If someone clicks the ad you cash in
I think a part of Google’s position needs to be explored a little more thoroughly. It would be nice if there was a good philosophical reasoning to dividing monetized links and popularity.
Jon,
I thought this was very weird as well.
At first I thought it was a well-oiled plan from some hacker to substitute his affiliate id with mine using tinyurl.com.
The same instant lack of credibility that you mention came to mind when I read that it was real.
I also received that e-email, and something important is the fact that they actually said:
“we’ve begun using tinyurl.com to shorten and secure our affiliate referral links”
“Please note that our old affiliate urls will no longer work in one week so please update today”
But if you add the word “PREVIEW” to any Tinyurl links like this:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/2gvesj
will give you the hidden link for that tinyurl, and guess what, you get the very same url they gave you the first time, so they aren`t changing any links, or at least not mine… check out your links to see if they changed
Sorry guys, Akismet had you all in purgatory…I rarely look in there but tonight I checked it and there was a whole discussion about this post. Yikes, sometimes Akismet has a really bad day, as I’ve been receiving moderation requests for real spam constantly all day today.
@David, good find. I’m sure someone from Google will be able to figure this trick out (of course they wouldn’t have to if they read this post
) and still penalize people using tinyurl. They’ll just write a robot that checks all the tinyurl links and that will probably piss tinyurl off a bit!
I think TLA will need to think up a better solution, this one seems a bit half-baked.
lolz what we can do as affiliates is to make php directs, so it seems more realistic.